Sunday, April 21, 2013

Poverty in Orlando



When considering social justice issues in Orlando Florida, one of the major concerns I have encountered is the number of people living in poverty.  The current Orlando Florida poverty level sits higher than the national average at 15.9% (Sebelius, 2013).  Recognized as The City Beautiful, Orlando has left many of its residents on the streets due to the cost of living and other socioeconomic factors.  Median rent in Orlando is $971 a month, which is 21% higher than the national average (Area Vibes, Inc, 2013). 
Minimum wage in Florida is $7.79 an hour (United States Department of Labor, 2013).  Simple math will lead you to the conclusion that a person who makes minimum wage and works a full 40 hours a week, every week out of the year, will make less than $15,000 annually before taxes.  If this said person is paying the average rent for an apartment in Orlando Florida, they will have a mere couple thousand dollars left over to cover the cost of transportation, food, child care, clothing, and other living expenses. 
Unemployment contributes to the number of people living in poverty.  As of August 2012, unemployment in Orlando was 8.7% (City Data, 2012).  Lack of education is also a contributing factor to low income households.  Roughly 82% of people aged 25 and older have just a mere high school education (City Data, 2012).  Lack of education contributes to the number of people who are forced to take minimum wage jobs.  Education is the key to economic self-sufficiency and breaking the cycle of poverty (Fight Poverty, 2006). 
Poverty increases the likelihood of crime, drug/alcohol abuse, and mental illness as well as a variety of other related factors (Poverties.org, 2013).  The cycle of poverty suggests that these issues are interrelated and do not normally occur on their own, making it hard to ever get out of poverty (Poverties.org, 2013).  The people who are impacted by poverty in Orlando are the men, women, and children who are unable to meet their basic needs due to various factors. 
So, who benefits by keeping people poor?  Political, economic, and social forces all contribute to the idea that there are benefits to having poor people.  It is said that poor people are less likely to vote to implement economic changes, are more likely to take dirty jobs, and are an important part of this society, which focuses on hierarchical order and the ability to compare individuals based on socioeconomic status (Gans, 2012).    
The goal of social work is to help people address their problems and match them with the necessary resources to function in a healthy way in this society, as is the case with individuals who are living in poverty.  According to the social work philosophy, “Peace is not possible where there are gross inequalities of money and power, whether between workers and managers, nations and nations or men and women” (National Association of Social Workers, 2013). 
In order to end poverty in Orlando, it would be beneficial for individuals to seek the support of local social service agencies.  Social workers need to address and assess the issues of crime, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, and mental illness on an individual basis in order to eliminate the cycle of poverty and implement changes in this society.  I believe the most effective way to do this is by helping individuals overcome their personal obstacles rather than tackling poverty as a macro issue.  Helping one person get out of poverty can break the cycle and increase the likelihood that generations to come will avoid living in poverty. 
References
Area Vibes, Inc. (2013). Orlando, Fl Housing, Homes & Rentals. Retrieved from http://www.areavibes.com/orlando-fl/housing/
City Data. (2012). Orlando, Florida. Orlando: CityData.com.
Fight Poverty. (2006). Causes of Child Poverty: Lack of Educational Attainment. Retrieved from http://www.fightpoverty.mmbrico.com/reasons/educational.html
Gans, H. (2012). The Benefits of Poverty. Challenger Magazine, pp. 114-125.
National Association of Social Workers. (2013). Social Justice. Retrieved from NASW: http://www.socialworkers.org/pressroom/features/issue/peace.asp
Poverties.org. (2013). Causes and Effects of Poverty on Society, Children, and Violence. Retrieved from Research for Social and Economic Development: http://www.poverties.org/effects-of-poverty.html
Sebelius, K. (2013). Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines. Retrieved from Federal Registrar: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/01/24/2013-01422/annual-update-of-the-hhs-poverty-guidelines#t-1
United States Department of Labor. (2013). Wage and Hour Division. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/america.htm

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Struggling with social work reality



Continually learning and maintaining a sense of cultural competency is crucial in culturally grounded social work, as I have been learning throughout my coursework in this graduate program.  Being aware of my own emotions and feelings and how they can be triggered by certain comments, situations, or actions is also important in determining how I interact with my environment.  Identifying what triggers my emotions, thoughts, and feelings will help to understand how I will act/react in any circumstance.   
One specific trigger that has impacted the way I interact with my clients and colleagues is the use of racial microaggressions.  In the past few months, the use of microaggressions in social work practice has become increasingly evident to me.   I find these microaggressions to be backhanded compliments which contribute to internalized oppression and continued stereotypes. Coming into this program, I expected a certain level of respect and cultural competency from my colleagues and peers, but this has not always been the case.  I have found that using these racial microaggressions is a way to display racism and is influencing the clients that get services.   I have also found that the language I use does not always take into account the feelings and emotions of others and how my words may trigger a reaction in another person.  I am beginning to understand the importance of monitoring the use of language in order to create an empowering environment for myself and my colleagues.  I am also speaking out when I hear something that is offensive.  I am also acknowledging that learning how to use language appropriately is a lifelong learning process and I am only at the beginning of my journey. 
When I hear someone using a microaggression, I become stressed out, angry, disappointed, and annoyed.  When I have encountered this situation, I have become angry with the person for being so offensive.  I have a hard time understanding why individuals choose to use the language they do, knowing that their words are not empathetic and they are contributing to continual systems of oppression.  I then become annoyed and disappointed with the person and stop listening and placing any value in what they have to say.  Overall, the whole situation stresses me out and makes me frustrated. 
I think I react in an unhealthy way because I set my expectations for every person the same and don’t always take into consideration their environment and upbringing, which influences the way they interact with the world.  My own experiences influence my interactions with people and sometimes when triggered, it is easy for me to forget that each person carries their own personal experiences and biases. 
These reactions certainly get in the way of how I interact with my clients and colleagues.  It is not healthy or realistic to shut down and ignore a person because I do not agree with what they are saying all the time.  Becoming annoyed and discouraged will destroy the healing environment that I seek to maintain in my practice setting.  I know these incidents are opportunities to learn and grow and I should not let my emotions cloud my thinking to the point where I shut down. 
I first need to manage my thoughts and emotions by acknowledging them.  Understanding what triggered an emotion or feeling in order to change my thought process and not get offended.  Becoming offended is just a defense mechanism and is not an adaptive way to handle a trigger.  Being mindful of the situation and taking into consideration my place of privilege and how that impacts the way I view the world will help me to lessen the effects of reactions to any trigger.  I also need to acknowledge that being sensitive is okay, but managing those emotions is critical.  If I put these changes into practice, I can excel in social work.

Friday, March 29, 2013

Implementing EFT in Somaliland



Introduction
Somaliland is a self-governing state on the centrally located west coast of Africa.  The majority of the 3.5 million people residing in Somaliland are followers of Islam (The Somaliland Government, 2013).  Somaliland recently gained independence in 1991 and is in the developing stages both politically and economically (The Somaliland Government, 2013).  Although Somaliland seems to be on its way up society’s hypothetical ladder, several members of the population are facing continued oppression and discrimination.  According to Maryan Qasim, Somalia’s women’s minister, Somalia has been ranked the fifth worst place in the world for women (Qasim, 2011).  Over 95% of female individuals between the ages of 4-11 have undergone the procedure of Female Genital Cutting (FGC), also referred to as Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) as a continued oppressive cultural tradition in Somaliland (Ismail, 2009).  Female Genital Mutilation is the cultural practice of cutting or altering female genitalia for the purpose of keeping women “clean” for a future husband (Sarkis, 2003).  FGM is practiced in many Islamic countries in the Middle East, however, it is not part of Islamic practice.  Indigenous groups, Muslims, Christians, Catholics, and Protestants alike have been tied to the practice of FGM, making it more than just a religious tradition (Sarkis, 2003).  Female Genital Cutting is a harmful and sometimes deadly procedure that damages a women’s body and leaves a scar on society.  Implementing Empowerment Feminist Therapy (EFT) into Somaliland’s engrained cultural beliefs may help to empower women and men alike to understand the negative effects of FGM and raise awareness about the detriment it poses to individuals, families, and the country as a whole. 
Context of Gender Based Violence
There are three different procedures which vary in the degree of mutilation that a girl in Somaliland may be subjected to.  These procedures include circumcision which involves the removal of the prepuce, with or without a part of the clitoris, clitoridectomy, which involves removal of part or all of the clitoris and scraping off the labia, and infibulation, which entails removing the clitoris and labia and sewing the vagina closed (Ismail, 2009).  The severity of Female Genital Cutting depends primarily on the person performing the cutting and the regionally accepted cultural tradition.  These vary among countries, religions, and regions of the world (Sarkis, 2003).  These procedures can be conducted soon after the birth of a child or any time before Menarche, but is usually performed on girls between 7-9 years old, as their tissues have had more time to grow, making it easier to perform FGM.  Female Genital Mutilation in Somaliland usually consists of cutting a portion of the clitoris, showing it to members of the community to ensure that enough has been cut, and sewing up the front of the vagina leaving a small area for urine to exit (Ismail, 2009).  The procedure is considered to be extremely painful and unsanitary, with many cutters using any kind of sharp object that is available (Ismail, 2009).  There are many physical complications to be considered including the immediate danger the child faces, reopening the wound during marriage, and giving birth to future children.  The female child who experiences the cutting may be prone to shock, tearing of the genitals, and extreme pain.  As the child grows older she faces problems with menstruation, including the possible onset of persistent urinary tract infections (Ismail, 2009).  When the girl is ready for marriage, the husband may forcibly penetrate the vagina or cut it open with scissors in order to perform intercourse (Ismail, 2009).  Many complications arise during pregnancy, birth, and delivery which may lead to maternal mortality (Ismail, 2009).  Many women wait helplessly for the day they will give birth and pray that they don’t die (Qasim, 2011).
Female Genital Mutilation has an effect on more than just the individual experiencing the cutting.  Somaliland holds a cultural expectation that women will remain virgins until they become married.  Cutting the clitoris and sewing up the vagina is proof to a future suitor that the woman has abstained from sexual intercourse (Ismail, 2009).  The ritual becomes a celebration where members of the family can also view the physical proof that the bride has remained sexually inactive (Qasim, 2011).  As a result of FGM, the woman may become infertile due to constant bleeding and obstruction of the fallopian tubes (Ismail, 2009).  Infertility can lead to a strain on a marriage and possible feelings of guilt and shame, which can create an onset of continued marital problems.  If the woman does get pregnant, there are numerous complications for the fetus and the mother.  The fetus may form improperly, become prone to hemorrhaging, and experience intrauterine death (Ismail, 2009).  The mother faces the fear of obstructed labor, uterine rupture, and maternal death (Ismail, 2009).  The family is likely to suffer the loss of the mother and/or the baby due to Female Genital Cutting. 
The likelihood that a girl who undergoes Female Genital Mutilation will become infected with HIV/AIDS is also a necessary consideration for the individual and community at large (Ismail, 2009).  The use of unsterilized cutting instruments increases the likelihood that women will contract the virus. Traditional FGM performers, which may consist of community elders, caregivers, or midwives, are usually not aware of the dangers of using these instruments and the long term consequences of their actions (Ismail, 2009).  Female Genital Mutilation is likely to increase the risk of HIV/AIDS due to bleeding and lack of sanitation (De Walque, 2006).  As of 2004, more than 23 million people were affected with AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa (De Walque, 2006), making Female Genital Mutilation and its contribution to HIV/AIDS more than just a micro concern.  Empowerment Feminist Therapy will be used as a guide to empower women to question the ritual and raise awareness on how FGM poses a threat to society.
Female Genital Mutilation is having an impact on all women in Somaliland.  Women continue to oppress each other by initiating and condoning FGM.  The socially accepted practice is seen as a rite of passage which Somaliland women consider to be part of their identity (Ismail, 2009).  When the Half the Sky team questions a woman in Somaliland about why she continues to practice FGM she replies that God won’t allow her to be uncircumcised.  Although Muslim women in Somaliland state their claim that God sanctions the continuation of this ritual, Female Genital Mutilation is not connected to Islamic practice (Sarkis, 2003), making it a socially constructed custom.  The goal of EFT  is to teach and empower women to place value in themelves and their bodies in order to deconstruct the mindset that this ritual is acceptable. 
Intervention
Implementing a therapy that focuses on institutionalized oppression, its effects on individuals, and the lack of support/resources from the community will be the most effective way to intervene in the lives of individuals who have experienced Female Genital Cutting.  Using Empowerment Feminist Therapy in Somaliland will help to increase awareness about traditional gender roles and embrace social and individual changes, which will, in turn, help to eliminate the practice of Female Genital Mutilation.  The ultimate goal of EFT is to allow the client to be the expert and empower them to create necessary change (Worell & Remer, 2003).  There are four basic principles which guide Empowerment Feminist Therapy; interdependence of personal and social identities, personal is political concept, interpersonal egalitarian relationships, and valuing women’s perspectives (Worell & Remer, 2003).  Before taking a feminist approach to therapy, the worker must explore and acknowledge their own personal intersectionalities and privilege in order to actively engage in the therapeutic process (Worell & Remer, 2003).  The ability to become emotionally involved and express empathy while remaining culturally competent is imperative in implementing Empowerment Feminist Therapy (Worell & Remer, 2003). 
In applying EFT with survivors of Female Genital Mutilation in Somaliland, the worker will attempt to understand the context of their personal situations by examining and raising awareness about their individual personal identities (Worell & Remer, 2003).  A survivor of FGM may be facing intersectionalities of gender, ethnicity, social class, age, ability, and characteristics which influence her privilege and oppression.  A young African American woman who is living in poverty is facing triple jeopardy based on gender, social class, and race (Marsiglia & Kulis, 2009).  A young woman in Somaliland may face intersections which include lack of education, low social class, and debilitating geographic location.  Occupying these oppressive identities limits an individual’s ability to gain access to necessary resources and opportunities, which may be the case of a survivor of FGM.  Acknowledging and examining how these identities impact the woman’s access to support is why using EFT is so crucial to the therapeutic process for women in Somaliland. 
Understanding the relationship between internalized oppression and its impacts on external experiences are the next steps in implementing change using Empowerment Feminst Therapy (Worell & Remer, 2003).  Reframing the culturally constructed mindset in Somaliland will help to initiate social change and challenge cultural norms (Worell & Remer, 2003).  Initiating social change is important to eradicate Female Genital Mutilation and change the engrained cultural beliefs which condone FGM.  Empowering women to create social change will increase the effectiveness of the intervention and help to mold new political and social changes (Worell & Remer, 2003).  Using Empowerment Feminist Therapy in Somaliland will help to create a lasting change where the women take control of their bodies and country. 
Meeting the client where they are is a necessary tool when taking a western view into a non-western world.  The worker should not bring assumptions based on personal privilege, but work to empower the client and share what they believe is an effective way to create change.  Setting goals together and using written contracts to hold each other accountable in the therapeutic process will help to ensure success in Empowerment Feminist Therapy (Worell & Remer, 2003).  The expression of anger in the theapuetic relationship should also be expressed and shared among worker and client willingly (Worell & Remer, 2003).  Individuals who have experienced FGM in Somililand are likely to become very emotional throughout the therapuetic process and it is important to validate these feelings and draw strengths from the individuals situation.  Acknowledging strengths in individuals will help to empower women to educate other women and create lasting social change. 
Beginning to recognize and value individual characteristics which may be encompassed by religion and culture is the final necessary step in Empowerment Feminist Therapy (Worell & Remer, 2003).  Somaliland women can begin to identify and value themselves and their bodies and take control of what is rightfully theirs.  Upon doing so, they will be able to value other women in their lives, including those who were responsible for the cutting.  These women will also be able to accept and value their own bodies, whether they have been mutilated or not. Women in Somaliland must accept and trust in their own personal experiences in order to implement social changes to create a world that  recognizes and understands the negative effects of Female Genital Mutilation. 
Empowerment Feminist Therapy seeks to implement therapuetic intervention by creating empathy and mutual understanding among the client and worker, teach and raise awareness about the clients identity and how that impacts their place in society, and create political and social action by initiating local and global awareness, while empowering the client and respecting diversity (Worell & Remer, 2003).  When considering the best way to implement an intervention into the lives of Somaliland women who have survived Female Genital Mutilation, this worker thinks there is no better way than to empower women to create change for themselves, their bodies, and their futures.  Implemeting long lasting social change and influencing political powers takes strength from within, meaning the residents of Somaliland.  Implementing a change in thinking about FGM will be more effective than attempting to pressure governments to outlaw the practice of Female Genital Cutting (Antonazzo, 2003).  The workers job is to help raise awareness in a therapeutic environment and stand side by side women as they are on the forefront of creating change for the future.  Working under an Empowerment Feminist Therapy perspective is essential in implementing positive theurapuetic techiniques, as it focuses on the women who are involved and initiates a change in thinking (Worell & Remer, 2003).   
Women in Somaliland have begun to rise up and raise awareness on the impacts of Female Genital Mutilation.  Edna Adan Ismail, who is trained as a nurse/midwife, has built a hospital in Hargeisa, Somaliland, which seeks to educate women and send them back into the community to spread awareness on the impacts of Female Genital Mutilation.  This feminist approach to creating change empowers women and helps them to regain control of their minds and bodies, while allowing them to engage communities and change the mindset of individuals in order to create social change.  In order to effectively implement Empowerment Feminist Therapy in Somaliland, social workers may consider teaming up with hospital representatives to work with clients who have experienced Female Genital Mutilation.  Building a relationship with midwives in Somaliland may prove to be an effective way to reach clients who are in need of empowering therapy while in the hospital and after they return home.  The Edna Adan Maternity and Teaching hospital in Somaliland would benefit from educating women in the importance of social work and sending them back to their communities as they do with midwives.  Implementing a social work education program would help Somaliland women in understanding the cultural norms about FGM, which have cross-generational effects on all residents.  
Conclusion
It is important to be culturally sensitive while implemeting intervention and maintain a sense of cultural competency.  Continually learning and self-examining in order to recognize privilege and use it in an effective way is essential in Empowerment Feminist Therapy and helps in the therapuetic relationship by keeping the worker socially and culturally grounded.  In order to implement change while respecting and valuing culture, western workers should help by directing financial aids toward groups that educate and empower women and change the mindset about Female Genital Cutting (Antonazzo, 2003).  Supporting grassroots campaigns that are considerate of culture and tradition is necessary in implementing this intervention.  Workers who seek to intervene in the lives of women and attempt to change the mindset about FGM need to be able to think outside the box in order to educate and spread awareness in a culturally sensitive way.  Working with and empowering the women effected and helping to identify the macro level forces which limit gender abilities and create oppression through inadequate funding, bureaucracies, and institutions is the building block for implementing culturally sensitive Empowerment Feminist Therapy in Somaliland.  As the chinese proverb goes, “If you give a man a fish he will eat for a day, if you teach him to fish, he will eat for a lifetime.”  The idea carries through for implementing change for women’s rights in Somaliland.



References
Antonazzo, Monica. (2003). Problems with Criminalizing Female Genital Cutting.  Peace
Review 15(4):471-477.
De Walque, D. (2006). Who Gets AIDS and How? The World Bank.
Ismail, E. A. (2009). Female Genital Mutilation Survey In Somaliland. Hargeisa, Somaliland: The Edna Adan Maternity and Teaching Hospital.
Marsiglia, F. F., & Kulis, S. (2009). Culturally Grounded Social Work; Diversity, Oppression, and change. Chicago: Lyceum Books, Inc.
Qasim, M. (2011, June 17). The women of Somalia are living in hell. Retrieved from The Guardian.
Sarkis, M. (2003). Female Genital Cutting (FGC): An Introduction. Retrieved from The Female Genital Cutting Education and Networking Project: http://www.fgmnetwork.org/intro/fgmintro.html
The Somaliland Government. (2013). Somaliland Culture. Retrieved from The Somaliland Government: http://somalilandgov.com/
Worell, J., & Remer, P. (2003). Feminist Perspectives in Therapy; Empowering Diverse Women. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.